tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7834278044623200822.post1771049717901074852..comments2020-02-11T07:00:47.713-08:00Comments on Oy Vey Gevalt: The "Found" da Vinci was not lostUgly Buddhist Womanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03169610774165246705noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7834278044623200822.post-88723653937445253732011-12-02T19:22:35.438-08:002011-12-02T19:22:35.438-08:00The da Vinci Project, Research Group
It is our ve...The da Vinci Project, Research Group<br /><br />It is our very strong considered opinion, backed up by substantial study, that this painting must be reviewed further in light of our mounting weight of proof that the painting is NOT the work of Lionardo, but that of another lesser talent. <br /><br />Owner Robert Simon, in New York, the historians, all the scholars involved, the restorer, and technical people, the team Simon put together, and The National Gallery of England, need to understand the "INTENT" of Lionardo, da Vinci the "Master" in order to make a proper assessment of the painting. It is this added dimension that is missing from the traditional authentication methods that has led to, in our opinion, an incorrect validation.<br /><br />This painting, not having been the work of Lionardo, da Vinci, but perhaps a student, contains many changes, but does not have the subtle trademark processes that Lionardo put into his works of art.<br /> It is a well-documented fact that lionardo da Vinci had a philosophy and penchant for infusing science and mathematics, with extreme accuracy into his every artistic endeavor. It leads to the supposition that his artworks would reflect his almost obsessive search for truth and accurate portrayal of everything around him. The artworks after all were an extension of the expression of his scientific studies. Using what is known about Lionardo from his writings and codex’s as a starting point to review the Salvatore Mundi original and "restored" images, yields a number of anomalies in the restored painting that are inconsistent with Lionardo's techniques, and his uniquely accurate portrayal of geometric symmetry, color, shadowing and scaling.<br />The painting, presently in the Jan Louis de Ganay collection Paris, was crafted in "RED and BLUE" clothing, and is in our opinion, the real Salvator Mundi. A detailed analysis of the measurements and proportions is a very telling indication of authenticity because of the clearly accurate alignment. Lionardo's technique of ensuring perfect ratios and alignment in his Salvatore Mundi painting may be compared to those found in his Vitruvian Man and other of his works.<br />Also the real Salvator Mundi painting has over 35 Symbols, in the lower half of the painting. Some are numbers, some are letters, and many are in "MICRO FORM", a process Lionardo invented to hide his intended messages. <br />It is unfortunate that the scholars are locked into a process that fails to consider motivation and intent because we firmly believe that these are key criteria against which Lionardo's, and the works of other artists of the period, must be tested.<br />As a result of our findings we strongly recommend that the "Blue" painting be reevaluated against the additional criteria we have found to be hallmarks found in all of Lionardo's works. We believe that this reevaluation will yield the finding that this is NOT the work of Lionardo.<br /><br /> By Michael W. Domoretsky<br />The da Vinci Project, Research GroupMichael W. Domoretskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12779026890434852881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7834278044623200822.post-71807268220628142342011-12-02T18:54:56.500-08:002011-12-02T18:54:56.500-08:00Conventional Wisdom / Thinking, is not a healthy m...Conventional Wisdom / Thinking, is not a healthy mindset, it creates a follower mentality and stifles creativity, progressive innovation and understanding. It is the safe route but in turn fosters mediocrity.... It creates gridlock.... The dark ages, where religious control was foisted on, and coupled with strict adherence to conventional thinking doctrine by the masses, was an extreme example. Today's fear of proffering a different or counter culture viewpoint in academia or research, though not engendering the physical consequences of old, still sadly inhibits the progress in understanding the truth. Though nothing new, this has been going on for thousands and thousands years, it would be far more advantageous for us, as a race and society, if we were more prone to be willing to accept and investigate new or different viewpoints, rather than be mired in, and fearful of, changes to the accepted paradigms.... We need to turn the page, wake up and entertain the possibilities.....<br /><br /><br />Founder, Michael W. Domoretsky<br />The da Vinci Project, Research Group<br />https://www.facebook.com/groups/200916973314185/Michael W. Domoretskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12779026890434852881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7834278044623200822.post-73778325140849878552011-12-02T18:49:52.335-08:002011-12-02T18:49:52.335-08:00Lionardo da Vinci: Salvator Mundi Savior of The Wo...Lionardo da Vinci: Salvator Mundi Savior of The World <br />michaelmwd.blogspot.comMichael W. Domoretskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12779026890434852881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7834278044623200822.post-13082999979290119612011-12-02T11:01:06.748-08:002011-12-02T11:01:06.748-08:00The da Vinci Project, Research Group
It is our ver...The da Vinci Project, Research Group<br />It is our very strong considered opinion, backed up by substantial study, that this painting must be reviewed further in light of our mounting weight of proof that the painting is NOT the work of Lionardo, but that of another lesser talent. <br /><br />Owner Robert Simon, in New York, the historians, all the scholars involved, the restorer, and technical people, the team Simon put together, and The National Gallery of England, need to understand the "INTENT" of Lionardo, da Vinci the "Master" in order to make a proper assessment of the painting. It is this added dimension that is missing from the traditional authentication methods that has led to, in our opinion, an incorrect validation.<br /><br />This painting, not having been the work of Lionardo, da Vinci, but perhaps a student, contains many changes, but does not have the subtle trademark processes that Lionardo put into his works of art.Michael W. Domoretskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12779026890434852881noreply@blogger.com